Richard Cyganiak wrote: > 1. SPARQL is great, but too verbose for the command line. I don't worry about this much, because I'm not interested in using it from the command line per se as much as the ability to use a script to retrieve data from a SPARQL endpoint, and doing it from the command line is the first step toward that. Doing it from a python/perl/etc. script and loading it into data structures from these languages is the next step I want to pursue. > 3. We are all waiting for SPARQL processors that federate multiple > SPARQL endpoints transparently into a single endpoint. Progress is being > made in this area, but it's slow. Meanwhile, there is a very nice 80/20 > solution to this problem: Andy Seaborne has implemented a SERVICE > keyword for his extended variant of SPARQL, which allows you to address > parts of a SPARQL query to a specific endpoint. This seems like an easy > win for data integration demos. Definitely, and to help the concept of Linked Data live up to its name. I had been planning a blog post titled "Linking Linked Data" but wasn't sure how I was going to go about it. I look forward to playing with the SERVICE keyword. BobReceived on Thursday, 18 September 2008 16:27:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:41:27 GMT