- From: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 00:25:16 +0100
- To: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
http://dbpedia.org/sitemap.xml All the *.rkbexplorer.com have them (the system generates them automatically). Eg http://dblp.rkbexplorer.com/sitemap.xml They have the appropriate entries in robots.txt. Mind you, Giovanni says that a lot of sitemaps are broken, so they fix them and cache the fixed ones for Sindice purposes :-) On 30/05/2008 00:02, "Peter Ansell" <ansell.peter@gmail.com> wrote: ... >> >> Richard >> >> [1] http://sw.deri.org/2007/07/sitemapextension/ > > That looks very usable to me. Has anyone used it for linked data? How > do you discover these sitemaps as a linked data user, as opposed to > sitemaps which are traditionally submitted to search engines for > searching. In either case, it would be nice to have an RDF description > submitted as part of a sitemap to a semantic search engine so it might > be good to standardise that mechanism based around these ideas. > > Also, there is a reference in that document to N-Quad format, what is > that exactly? [2] is a bit sparse on examples so it is hard to > understand what is meant by the syntax. > > Also, is the slicing declaration attempting to make up for a deficit > in the SPARQL protocol w.r.t. DESCRIBE? Why not utilise SELECT if you > had an idea of what pieces of information you desire, although I guess > the server is in the best position to recommend information to you > with DESCRIBE queries. I think slicing mechanisms should be defined > outside of that context, although the lack of progress with CBD [3] is > a little worrying with respect to that bit. > > [2] http://sw.deri.org/2008/02/nx/ > [3] http://www.w3.org/Submission/CBD/ > > Cheers, > > Peter > >
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2008 23:26:05 UTC