W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > June 2008

RE: [call for comments] voiD - vocabulary of interlinked datasets

From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:40:12 +0200
Message-ID: <768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852017108CC@RZJC2EX.jr1.local>
To: "Keith Alexander" <k.j.w.alexander@gmail.com>, "Olaf Hartig" <hartig@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
Cc: <public-lod@w3.org>


Just one tiny addition to Keith - provenance is indeed in scope (as it
says it on the Wiki, but too hidden, I guess):

' + using scovo to attach statistics (such as number of instances of a
certain class, etc.) and extend with dc:provenance for scovo:Item'

so, the basic idea IIRC is to extend scovo (which is under our control
as well ;) to hold the provenance information.

Thanks for your feedback!


 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Keith Alexander [mailto:k.j.w.alexander@gmail.com] 
>Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 2:07 PM
>To: Olaf Hartig; Hausenblas, Michael; public-lod@w3.org
>Subject: Re: [call for comments] voiD - vocabulary of 
>interlinked datasets
>> you think additional provenance information is beyond the scope of
>Our aim is that existing vocabularies like DC be used where 
>possible, and  the primer Michael mentioned will hopefully give advice
>which existing terms are most appropriate to use with the voiD
vocabulary. In 
>this case,  perhaps ?dataset foaf:maker ?agent  ?
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2008 12:47:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:15:50 UTC