Re: A proposal for two additional properties for LOCN

Hello everyone,

I took the liberty of updating the wiki page 
<https://www.w3.org/community/locadd/wiki/Proposal_for_extension_of_LOCN_with_properties_for_Coordinate_Reference_System_and_Level_of_Detail>, 
an attempt to keep the wiki up with the discussion. I have added a CRS 
class. I sense agreement that introducing the CRS class is a step in the 
right direction, but frankly I did not really get Krzysztof's proposal 
to use guarded restrictions to scope the CRS locally. Could someone 
(Krzysztof?) elaborate on that?

As for the spatial resolution, I am struggling to find a good way to 
express this. It seems to me we want to be able to specify a unit and a 
value for the spatial resolution. I think it would be nice if we could 
also define the spatial resolution to be a distance:  a regular distance 
(measured in metres, feet, ....) or an angular distance (measured in 
degrees, radians,...).  I took a brief look at QUDT (http://qudt.org/), 
but I have not been able to find an appropriate distance quantity. So 
suggestions are very welcome!

Regards,
Frans



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frans Knibbe
Geodan
President Kennedylaan 1
1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)

T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
www.geodan.nl <http://www.geodan.nl> | disclaimer 
<http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
------------------------------------------------------------------------