Re: Let's really use the wiki?

Following the proposal made in the mail below, we updated the LOCADD main
wiki page by including a section on "Issues and use cases", including a
tentative list of use issues/cases, each pointing to a separate page:
- Linked Data based thematic web mapping
- Sub-properties for locn:geometry
- CRS specification
- How to model geographical identifiers

BTW, the first in the list corresponds to the old "Use cases" page.

About the actual drafting, any contribution is, of course, more than
welcome, but it would be good to have an editor / coordinator for each of
them.

Any volunteer?

Thanks!

Michael and Andrea

---
[1]http://www.w3.org/community/locadd/wiki/Main_Page


On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Andrea Perego <
andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu> wrote:

> Thanks, Frans.
>
> Michael and I were thinking to start using the wiki as soon as the topics
> under discussion would have reached some degree of consolidation, but we're
> also happy with your proposal. As you rightly point out, it may be quite
> difficult to keep track of the (happily!) many points under discussion in
> the mailing list.
>
> I created a main page for the LOCN voc [1], where we can link to separate
> pages for all the LOCN terms. Please let me know whether you would like to
> make any changes to the tentative structure I used.
>
> It may be also useful to create separate pages for topics under discussion
> having a scope more general than specific terms in the LOCN voc (as the
> ones in the threads concerning CRS specification, interoperability patterns
> - meaning, re-use and alignment of terms from different vocabularies).
>  These can be linked from an "Issues" page in the wiki.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andrea
>
> ----
> [1]
> http://www.w3.org/community/locadd/wiki/ISA_Programme_Location_Core_Vocabulary_(LOCN)
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Raj Singh <rsingh@opengeospatial.org>wrote:
>
>> Great idea.
>>
>> Raj
>>
>> On Jan 10, 2014, at 6:12 AM, Frans Knibbe | Geodan <
>> frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I think it is great to see so much activity on the list, ever since the
>> core location vocabulary was adopted. After all, the subject matter is very
>> fascinating. But I am sure I am not the only one who feels overwhelmed by
>> that same activity. So wouldn't it be a good idea to structure the exchange
>> of ideas a bit more? As Phil mentioned, we do have a wiki. Perhaps it could
>> be put to good use to record things like change proposals and different
>> interpretations of vocabulary elements? We could give all classes and
>> properties (existing and proposed) their own wiki page, for example.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Frans
>>
>> --
>> --------------------------------------
>> *Geodan*
>> President Kennedylaan 1
>> 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)
>>
>> T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
>> E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
>> www.geodan.nl | disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
>> --------------------------------------
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
> European Commission DG JRC
> Institute for Environment & Sustainability
> Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data
> Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy
>
> DE+RD Unit: http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/DE
>
> ----
> The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
> not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
> position of the European Commission.
>



-- 
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
European Commission DG JRC
Institute for Environment & Sustainability
Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

DE+RD Unit: http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/DE

----
The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
position of the European Commission.