Re: Sub-properties for locn:geometry?

On 2014-01-18 12:16, Raphaël Troncy wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> Sure. But this can already be presented with the current model.
>
> Perhaps what is missing at the moment is a sort of primer that 
> describes a few of these use cases and show how the current locn 
> vocabulary could be used to model those needs. Beyond the formal 
> definition of the vocabulary classes and properties in the ontology, I 
> observe that adopters of vocabulary often like to refer to concrete 
> example and adapt afterwards to their needs. Should we start to 
> produce concrete examples with the vocabulary, for example on the wiki?

An excellent idea! Some examples can really help in discussions and 
understanding. Furthermore, they are crucial if we want the vocabulary 
to be actually used by application developers and the like.
>
>   Raphaël
>


-- 
--------------------------------------
*Geodan*
President Kennedylaan 1
1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)

T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
www.geodan.nl <http://www.geodan.nl> | disclaimer 
<http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
--------------------------------------