Re: Last telecon: discussion about use cases

No misunderstanding, Ghislain. Your comments were definitely to the
point, and they should be taken into account in the PAT use case to
explain and motivate the adopted solution.

Our mail was just meant to propose a procedure to follow to publish
use cases, since this topic was not addressed during our kick-off
meeting.

Cheers,

Andrea

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Ghislain Atemezing
<auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>> Since the CG has not yet taken any decision on use cases, our proposal
>> is to leave any member free to add his/her own, after having sent a
>> summary to the CG. Of course, before proposing a separate use case, it
>> is important to consider the possibility of merging it with existing
>> and possibly overlapping use cases, whenever appropriate.
>
> +1
>
>> Unless the CG disagrees with this approach, we would then give Feroz
>> the green light to add the PAT use case.
>
> Just to emphasize that it was not my intention not to have  the PAT UC here.
> My questions re the paper was intended to clarify some aspects that could
> help understanding better the UC, if proposed.
> Sorry if there were misinterpretation in my last message.
>
> Cheers,
> Ghislain
>
> --
> Ghislain A. Atemezing
> EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
> 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
>
> e-mail: auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr & ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com
> Tel: +33 (0)4- 9300 8178
> Fax: +33 (0)4- 9000 8200
> Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin
>
>



--
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
European Commission DG JRC
Institute for Environment & Sustainability
Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

DE+RD Unit: http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/DE

----
The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
position of the European Commission.

Received on Sunday, 17 February 2013 20:56:47 UTC