W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-locadd@w3.org > February 2013

Re: LOCADD SoA Survey: TOC proposal

From: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:00:19 +0100
Message-id: <CAHzfgWDxrB5GNiVtMm_oLufJdtfT8A+6rFfT_5k8BiHUnezN5g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Frans Knibbe | Geodan <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
Cc: LocAdd W3C CG Public Mailing list <public-locadd@w3.org>
Thanks for this, Frans. We'll include your comments as a discussion
item in the agenda of tomorrow's call.

Cheers,

Andrea

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Frans Knibbe | Geodan
<frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Here are some comments on the structure of the wiki/survey:
>
> I think the list of use cases could be a high level entity. Use cases are an
> important concept in the scope and mission of the group, so it makes sense
> to make them a high level entity. Each use case could have its own chapter,
> with a description of the use case followed by an assessment of support of
> the use case by each of the specifications that will be reviewed.
>
> Next to the use cases, I would like to see a chapter on overall quality of
> the standards that will be reviewed. Use cases are a nice way to compare
> vocabularies, but there is a chance that use cases do not cover everything
> that will be demanded in the future. I think the different methods should
> also be judged by their intrinsic merits, things like simplicity, logic and
> elegance.
>
> Perhaps a final chapter named 'recommendations' could be added? It is nice
> to have a clear outcome of the work of the group.
>
> Regards,
> Frans
>
>
> On 14-1-2013 14:34, Andrea Perego wrote:
>>
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> We have posted on the LOCADD wiki a tentative TOC for the survey:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/community/locadd/wiki/SoA_Survey
>>
>> We are keen to know your opinion on this draft. We would like to reach
>> an as far as possible unanimous consensus on the final structure for
>> the survey, before starting adding any content. BTW, the content now
>> in the survey has been included only for explanatory purposes.
>>
>> Although we would like to use mainly the mailing list for our
>> discussion, please feel free to insert your comments also in the wiki
>> - please mark them with:
>>
>> @@@yourname
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Andrea and Michael
>>
>> --
>> Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
>> European Commission DG JRC
>> Institute for Environment & Sustainability
>> Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data
>> Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
>> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy
>>
>> DE+RD Unit: http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/DE
>>
>> ----
>> The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
>> not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
>> position of the European Commission.
>>
>
>
>



--
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
European Commission DG JRC
Institute for Environment & Sustainability
Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

DE+RD Unit: http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/DE

----
The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
position of the European Commission.

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Frans Knibbe | Geodan
<frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Here are some comments on the structure of the wiki/survey:
>
> I think the list of use cases could be a high level entity. Use cases are an
> important concept in the scope and mission of the group, so it makes sense
> to make them a high level entity. Each use case could have its own chapter,
> with a description of the use case followed by an assessment of support of
> the use case by each of the specifications that will be reviewed.
>
> Next to the use cases, I would like to see a chapter on overall quality of
> the standards that will be reviewed. Use cases are a nice way to compare
> vocabularies, but there is a chance that use cases do not cover everything
> that will be demanded in the future. I think the different methods should
> also be judged by their intrinsic merits, things like simplicity, logic and
> elegance.
>
> Perhaps a final chapter named 'recommendations' could be added? It is nice
> to have a clear outcome of the work of the group.
>
> Regards,
> Frans
>
>
> On 14-1-2013 14:34, Andrea Perego wrote:
>>
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> We have posted on the LOCADD wiki a tentative TOC for the survey:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/community/locadd/wiki/SoA_Survey
>>
>> We are keen to know your opinion on this draft. We would like to reach
>> an as far as possible unanimous consensus on the final structure for
>> the survey, before starting adding any content. BTW, the content now
>> in the survey has been included only for explanatory purposes.
>>
>> Although we would like to use mainly the mailing list for our
>> discussion, please feel free to insert your comments also in the wiki
>> - please mark them with:
>>
>> @@@yourname
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Andrea and Michael
>>
>> --
>> Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
>> European Commission DG JRC
>> Institute for Environment & Sustainability
>> Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data
>> Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
>> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy
>>
>> DE+RD Unit: http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/DE
>>
>> ----
>> The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
>> not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
>> position of the European Commission.
>>
>
>
>



-- 
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
European Commission DG JRC
Institute for Environment & Sustainability
Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

DE+RD Unit: http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/DE

----
The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
position of the European Commission.
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2013 14:01:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 February 2013 14:01:07 GMT