- From: Oscar Corcho <ocorcho@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 14:13:41 +0100
- To: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>, LocAdd W3C CG Public Mailing list <public-locadd@w3.org>
- CC: Michael Lutz <michael.lutz@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
Well spotted, Raphäel, In fact, ogc:Point refers really to sf:Point, where sf stands for <http://www.opengis.net/ont/sf#> Oscar -- Oscar Corcho Ontology Engineering Group (OEG) Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial Facultad de Informática Campus de Montegancedo s/n Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, España Tel. (+34) 91 336 66 05 Fax (+34) 91 352 48 19 El 28/12/13 13:57, "Raphaël Troncy" <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr> escribió: >Hello, > >> While reading the description of the vocabulary, I have realized that >> you are not providing the prefix for geosparql (the one that you use in >> ogc:Point, ogc:asWKT, etc). It would be good to add it somewhere in the >> document. > >I agree. I supposed that the ogc prefix refers to ><http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#>. Note that this vocabulary used >instead the 'geo' prefix, although both LOV and prefix.cc prefer to >associate 'geo' with <http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#>. In >prefix.cc, 'ogc' is not associated with any URI while LOV prefers to use >'gsp' to talk about the GeoSPARQL vocabulary. >Question: can we all agree on a convenient prefix name? > >http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql# defines the 'asWKT' datatype >property but I cannot find a definition for 'Point' in this namespace. >What am I missing? >Best regards. > > Raphaël > >-- >Raphaël Troncy >EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech >Multimedia Communications Department >450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France. >e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com >Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 >Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 >Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Saturday, 28 December 2013 13:14:15 UTC