W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lld@w3.org > October 2011

RE: Linked Library Holdings/Items

From: Francisca Hernandez <Francisca.hernandez@digibis.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:47:20 +0200
To: Jakob Voss <jakob.voss@gbv.de>, "public-lld@w3.org" <public-lld@w3.org>, "dini-ag-kim-lld@lists.d-nb.de" <dini-ag-kim-lld@lists.d-nb.de>
Message-ID: <53EF2400E4A0444FBEB8C60F2A2B042E95EDCE6EFB@dgb002.digibis.com>
Hi,
Maybe you can try FRBRoo from International Working Group on FRBR and CIDOC CRM Harmonisation. It defines the class F5.Item as physical objects (printed books, scores, CDs, DVDs, CD-ROMS, etc.) that carry a F24 Publication Expression and were produced by an industrial process involving a F3 Manifestation Product Type
http://www.cidoc-crm.org/frbr_drafts.html
It is a subclass of E84.Information Carrier (CIDOC CRM) which can be related to a collection by the property P46 is composed of (forms part of)

Regards
Francisca Hernández

-----Mensaje original-----
De: public-lld-request@w3.org [mailto:public-lld-request@w3.org] En nombre de Jakob Voss
Enviado el: viernes, 14 de octubre de 2011 13:11
Para: public-lld@w3.org; dini-ag-kim-lld@lists.d-nb.de
Asunto: Linked Library Holdings/Items

Hi,

I just started to experiment with RDF encoding of information about library holdings. Has anyone done something in this direction yet, so we can adjust our conceptual models and ontologies?

In my terminology, a holding resource is an "item" as the "Item" entity from FRBR. I created an equivalent item class in DAIA ontology and found that the FaBiO ontology defines its own subclass of frbr:item. I am not sure whether we really need this three classes for library holdings:

http://purl.org/ontology/daia/Item
http://purl.org/spar/fabio/Item
http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#Item

In lack of existing RDF properties for library holdings I created

http://purl.org/ontology/daia/label

for call numbers and

http://purl.org/ontology/daia/heldBy

for a "holding" relationship between item and a library institution. (by the way: is "held by proper English or better "hold by"?). Unfortunately the international ISIL agency has not defined an URI prefix for ISIL yet, so I recommend to use the prefix from lobid.org.


The FaBiO has some more properties that could be used to describe library holdings, but I hesitate to reuse purely theoretical ontologies from academics that have not been applied to real world library data.

ISO 28560 and its data model could also be helpful, but I don't have a copy of it (I think the relevant parts are page 6-12 of ISO 28560-2:2011). This is the best information I could find:

http://www.bic.org.uk/e4librariesfiles/pdfs/110524%20UK%20Data%20Model%20for%20RFID%20in%20Libraries%20final.pdf
http://www.bic.org.uk/e4libraries/11/RFID-/

Do we have URIs for "ONIX media format" and "MARC media format" yet and how do you relate an item to its format?


Here are some examples of my current, rudimentary encoding of some holding data in RDF (in German):

http://uri.gbv.de/item/opac-de-hil2:epn:134005953
http://uri.gbv.de/item/opac-de-7:epn:943768179

To get a visual feeling of the underlying RDF graphs, just add "?format=svg" to the URIs

I am still looking for good RDF properties to connect an item to the library record which is about the item's frbr:Manifestation (or frbr:Expression?)..

Jakob

--
Jakob Voß <jakob.voss@gbv.de>, skype: nichtich Verbundzentrale des GBV (VZG) / Common Library Network Platz der Goettinger Sieben 1, 37073 Göttingen, Germany
+49 (0)551 39-10242, http://www.gbv.de
Received on Friday, 14 October 2011 11:46:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 14 October 2011 11:46:10 GMT