W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lld@w3.org > May 2011

Re: AW: Recommendations: URIs

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 11:00:23 -0700
Message-ID: <20110503110023.597526ymjnhcze7r@kcoyle.net>
To: public-lld@w3.org
Quoting Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>:

> On "not exactly in those words", I'm not sure the point I wanted to  
> make is entirely captured by the recommendations I can currently  
> find, "Create URIs for library resources in good time" [1] or  
> "Develop policies for RDF vocabulary namespaces" [2].

I agree. We're thinking of doing some reorganization of the  
recommendations page, and I will work on the URI section to try to get  
more of this discussion into it.

One thing that has me confused, however, when folks talk about  
assigning identifiers for library resources... if they mean "instance  
data" (which I interpret to be something like "bibliographic records"  
but in LD), that can't really be created until there are URIs for  
element sets and value vocabularies, true? So I'm not sure how we can  
focus on instance data first. Would instance data mean creating URIs  
for books and journals and WEM fragments?


It is more
> specific to the vocabulary issue, while [1] is quite general (in  
> fact in the light of the previous discussion I would interpreted it  
> as focused on "dataset-resources" or "value vocabulary-resources").  
> And [2] seems rather technical than organization-oriented.
> But perhaps it's just a matter of wording...
> Antoine
> [1]  
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_recommendations_page#Create_URIs_for_library_resources_in_good_time_.5BGD.5D
> [2]  
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_recommendations_page#Develop_policies_for_RDF_vocabulary_namespaces_.5BGD.5D

Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 18:00:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:27:43 UTC