W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lld@w3.org > March 2011

AW: LD and Redundancy

From: Neubert Joachim <J.Neubert@zbw.eu>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:18:18 +0100
Message-ID: <3A59BB6451C972429019B12996F92DAD048FA02A@frodo.zbw-nett.zbw-kiel.de>
To: "Karen Coyle" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, "public-lld" <public-lld@w3.org>
Since libraries are already starting to publish linked open bibliographic data - which is a good thing! -, each one with its own uris, which is unavoidable, the importance of co-reference services (such as sameas.org) will grow. Since the already used identities for catalog records are much wider spread than for authorities, I'm not sure that a centralized model for building clusters (like VIAF) or a pre-declared central hub ("everybody maps to WorldCat/OpenLibrary/whatever") could work. 

An important issue for the report, indeed, even if we were not able to suggest solutions.

Cheers, Joachim

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: public-lld-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-lld-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Karen Coyle
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. März 2011 15:31
> An: public-lld
> Betreff: LD and Redundancy
> 
> The small group working on the "issues" section of the report 
> has run into something that I think is a question for the 
> whole group and list
> subscribers:
> 
> Library catalogs today, between them, have a high redundancy 
> of bibliographic descriptions for commonly held items. If we 
> anticipate much of the bibliographic data becoming linked 
> data, is this redundancy a problem? If so, what types of 
> solutions should we be looking at? If not, why not?
> 
> Thanks!
> kc
> 
> -- 
> Karen Coyle
> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
> ph: 1-510-540-7596
> m: 1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet
> 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2011 16:18:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 23 March 2011 16:19:03 GMT