- From: Glen Newton <glen.newton@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:32:28 -0400
- To: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>
- Cc: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, public-lld@w3.org
> Those are extremely different to me. If we mean, "on the web", please can we say that? +1 On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org> wrote: > > On 16 Jun 2011, at 13:43, Karen Coyle wrote: > >> Quoting Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>: >> >>> On 15 Jun 2011, at 20:12, Karen Coyle wrote: >>> >>>> Linked Data may be a first step toward an "in the cloud" approach to managing cultural information -- one which will be more cost-effective than individual systems in institutions. This approach will make it possible for small institutions or individual projects to be visible and connected, with reduced infrastructure costs. >>> >>> Do we mean, "in the cloud", as in "cloud computing"? I find this section unclear. >> >> I suspect that "in the cloud" has become a synonym for "on the web." > > Those are extremely different to me. If we mean, "on the web", please can we say that? > >> >>> >>> In particular, are we advocating that individual organizations hold their own metadata and aggregate it (i.e. SEO, etc)? Or that individual organizations publish through larger groups? >> >> I don't think we're advocating anything that specific. However the data gets into LOD space is fine. I think there will be a number of different functioning models for how that happens. > > "in the cloud" strongly suggests a preference to the latter, to me. > > -Jodi > >> >> kc >> >>> >>> -Jodi >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Karen Coyle >> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net >> ph: 1-510-540-7596 >> m: 1-510-435-8234 >> skype: kcoylenet >> >> > > > -- -
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2011 18:33:16 UTC