W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lld@w3.org > September 2010

Re: Non- and Partial-FRBR Metadata

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:34:29 +0200
Message-ID: <4C9657B5.1090501@few.vu.nl>
To: Ross Singer <rxs@talisplatform.com>
CC: public-lld@w3.org
On 9/16/10 3:48 PM, Ross Singer wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Antoine Isaac<aisaac@few.vu.nl>  wrote:
>> Btw could we use RDF blank nodes as an alternative here? That would bring no
>> extra URI, and *if you think you need it*, the ability to have these FRBR
>> statements that link the W and the M (and thus to access one from another) .
> Yeah, I think this could be a great way to work around the problem.
> My only concern (not necessarily based in any facts or evidence, mind
> you) might be an impact it might have on SPARQL.  If it doesn't affect
> SPARQLing too adversely, I'd say it's a winner.

I think the complexity of the SPARQL queries would be the same. What makes the SPARQL query complex (in terms of graph patterns) is the properties you use in the graph patterns (thus, the number of edges)---not whether the nodes are blank nodes or "fully fledged" resources.

Received on Sunday, 19 September 2010 18:35:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:27:37 UTC