W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lld@w3.org > November 2010

Re: VIAF contributor model

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:39:48 +0100
Message-ID: <4CD9CDB4.5000301@few.vu.nl>
To: "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>
CC: public-lld <public-lld@w3.org>



> Unless someone objects, I would like to streamline the /#skos:Concept URI in the next VIAF release. This would affect Bernard’s example like so:
>
> <http://viaf.org/viaf/102333412>  foaf:focus <http://viaf.org/viaf/102333412/#foaf:Person>
>
> The reason is that I naively reinvented chunks of SKOS/SKOSXL in the VIAF ontology and I would like to reconcile them in the next ontology like so:
>
> #NameAuthorityCluster rdf:type owl:Class ;
>
>              rdfs:subClassOf skos:Concept .
>
> I’m working on a more detailed explanation as we speak. If someone feels strongly about preserving the /#skos:Concept URI form I could add an owl:sameAs to the RDF like so:
>
> <http://viaf.org/viaf/102333412>  owl:sameAs <http://viaf.org/viaf/102333412/#skos:Concept>
>
> I would rather pretend it never existed, though. Any opinions on this?


It's not really good practice to have dead links. Is anyone using these URIs for now? If not (and I believe that if some people do, they would be lurking around that list) then you'd still better make that change really fast....

Cheers,

Antoine

  
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 22:39:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 9 November 2010 22:39:42 GMT