> Unless someone objects, I would like to streamline the /#skos:Concept URI in the next VIAF release. This would affect Bernard’s example like so: > > <http://viaf.org/viaf/102333412> foaf:focus <http://viaf.org/viaf/102333412/#foaf:Person> > > The reason is that I naively reinvented chunks of SKOS/SKOSXL in the VIAF ontology and I would like to reconcile them in the next ontology like so: > > #NameAuthorityCluster rdf:type owl:Class ; > > rdfs:subClassOf skos:Concept . > > I’m working on a more detailed explanation as we speak. If someone feels strongly about preserving the /#skos:Concept URI form I could add an owl:sameAs to the RDF like so: > > <http://viaf.org/viaf/102333412> owl:sameAs <http://viaf.org/viaf/102333412/#skos:Concept> > > I would rather pretend it never existed, though. Any opinions on this? It's not really good practice to have dead links. Is anyone using these URIs for now? If not (and I believe that if some people do, they would be lurking around that list) then you'd still better make that change really fast.... Cheers, AntoineReceived on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 22:39:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 9 November 2010 22:39:42 GMT