AW: SemWeb terminology page

Hi Mark,

Good point!

> About terminology:
> 
> I understand that FOAF, FRAD, ... are called "vocabularies" by this
> group (although I would term them "schemas" or "metadata schemas").

I like also the RDA, FRBRer etc. terminology "element sets"

> But what are AAT, LCSH, ... called, if not "vocabularies" (at least I
> hope a separate term is reserved for terminological resources).

Here I prefer the term "value vocabularies" because they usually act as
values for "elements"

Cheers, Alexander

> Mark
> 
> On 29/10/2010 16:38, Karen Coyle wrote:
> > sorry about that prior glitch. I have started the terminology page
for
> > semantic web terms:
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/Semantic_Web_terminology
> >
> > and did one entry as an example. I will work on it as I have time,
but
> > please step in and add what you can. Remember, this is to be
> > explanations for novices, not formal definitions, so please be
> > user-friendly.
> >
> > kc
> >
> 
> --
>   Mark van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
>             http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark