- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 23:21:53 +0200
- To: Emmanuelle Bermes <emmanuelle.bermes@bnf.fr>
- CC: Tom Morris <tfmorris@gmail.com>, Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>, public-lld@w3.org, team-xg-activity <team-xg-activity@w3.org>
Dear all, > We intend to use public-xg-lld@w3.org <mailto:public-xg-lld@w3.org> > mainly for XG housekeeping stuff, like teleconference scheduling for > instance. > Minutes will be circulated on this list (public-lld@w3.org > <mailto:public-lld@w3.org>), and we expect discussions to happen there too. Similar to others, I don't think this is a good idea to have two lists. I don't really see the rationale for such a setup except if you would like to encourage cross-posting which I'm sure you don't want. Is it for keeping away the interested reader from the (boring) day-to-day management of the group (telecon agenda, actions tracking, etc.) and hoping that only core discussions will happen on public-lld@w3.org? Then you're wrong. People will never know to which list to post ... they will either cross-post or you will have bit of discussion on one list and the rest on the other. People are smart enough to filter down and don't read messages that they don't care (e.g. the weekly agenda). In a nutshell: keep it simple. Use ONE list, public! Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Thursday, 3 June 2010 21:23:42 UTC