- From: Manue <manue@figoblog.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:35:28 +0100
- To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Cc: "Tillett, Barbara" <btil@loc.gov>, public-lld <public-lld@w3.org>
There is a "problems & limitations" section in our UC template. Use case owners didn't always fill it, but still, maybe we should add a section focusing on the problems identified, in our analysis effort. Emma On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote: > Barbara, those are definitely big ones in my mind. I think there are others > like the fact that we have a rather hodge-podge of RDF vocabularies that we > need to fill out. I think there is a big one lurking, which is the lack of > applications for linked data (other than SPARQL, but I see it as an > underlying tool rather than an actual application). In any case, these > should point the way to future activities that the community should support. > > kc > > Quoting "Tillett, Barbara" <btil@loc.gov>: > >> Aren't some of the big ones centered around the cost of converting legacy >> data and developing new systems to follow some as yet unidentified data >> structure? - bt >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-lld-request@w3.org [mailto:public-lld-request@w3.org] On >> Behalf Of Karen Coyle >> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 3:42 PM >> To: public-lld >> Subject: Missing analysis? >> >> >> We don't seem to have identified in our use cases the problems that people >> are facing; what is holding them back; what is missing from the available >> technology that would make LLD implementable. It seems that this would be an >> important section in the report since it is from these barriers that >> projects could be incubated. >> >> kc >> >> -- >> Karen Coyle >> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net >> ph: 1-510-540-7596 >> m: 1-510-435-8234 >> skype: kcoylenet >> >> >> > > > > -- > Karen Coyle > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net > ph: 1-510-540-7596 > m: 1-510-435-8234 > skype: kcoylenet > > >
Received on Thursday, 23 December 2010 06:36:01 UTC