- From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:52:59 -0500
- To: "Tillett, Barbara" <btil@loc.gov>
- Cc: Kai Eckert <kai@informatik.uni-mannheim.de>, public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>, "public-lld@w3.org" <public-lld@w3.org>
Hi Barbara, On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Tillett, Barbara <btil@loc.gov> wrote: > Why is "citation" not just an application of using bibliographic data that identifies a bibliographic entity? Isn't the bibliographic data part (separate from the relationship information connecting the cited work and the citing work) the same as in a bibliographic record (granted less)? I agree. Since there is a separate group working on Bibliographic Data Cluster [1] I think this distinction is *very* important to make. Was there some text in the Citation Cluster document [2] that seems to contradict this, or muddy the waters? I just tried to tighten up our definition a bit, but this is an evolving document so please feel free to send specific suggestions to the list. //Ed [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Cases#Cluster:_Bibliographic_data [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Cluster_Citations
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2010 14:55:29 UTC