- From: james anderson <james@dydra.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 15:16:34 +0000
- To: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
good evening; > On 2017-05-22, at 17:11, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote: > > > […] > > We also evaluated other headers (eg link rel=next|prev|first|last) but the complexity outweighed the purity of separating paging operation from the data model. Putting paging into the headers means that the only useful representation is the full HTTP response, making offline/in-memory caching much harder. another view is that it indicates that the api to construct and manipulate the “offline-in-memory” instantiation is deficient. best regards, from berlin, --- james anderson | james@dydra.com | http://dydra.com
Received on Monday, 22 May 2017 15:17:13 UTC