RE: Using rdf:type instead of @type for node types from Markus Lanthaler on 2016-03-01 (public-linked-json@w3.org from March 2016)

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 21:51:14 +0100
To: <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-ID: <114201d173fc$18d57450$4a805cf0$@gmx.net>

On 22 Feb 2016 at 14:25, Adrian Pohl wrote:
> Thus, the proposed solution is out of question for our use case. Do you
> see a problem with using "type" mapped to rdf:type? Do others have an
> opinion on this?

I don't see any problem with that. Please note that framing isn't standardized yet so things may change there anyway.

--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2016 20:51:44 UTC