W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > May 2013

Re: JSON-LD for USG

From: Tom Morris <tfmorris@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 11:32:01 -0400
Message-ID: <CAE9vqEFLih_YcFGp1NYcbZWvEETec59oFH4tmXTbT84uLWCEVw@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
Cc: JSON-LD JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 10:23 AM, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote:

>
> It also wouldn't hurt to comment in this thread:
>   https://github.com/project-open-data/project-open-data.github.io/pull/21


Interesting thread of comments.  The crux of the "anti" argument seems to
be that they don't want to mandate things which aren't already widely
adopted and they don't see LD or JSON-LD as being widely adopted in
comparison to more mainstream things like CSV & XML.

Would you say that their impression is mistaken and that JSON-LD adoption
is on par with that of CSV or XML? What would you say the rough percentages
are?

Tom
Received on Saturday, 18 May 2013 15:32:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:53:22 UTC