- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 22:09:21 +0200
- To: "'Linked JSON'" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
- Cc: "'RDF WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Wednesday, May 01, 2013 9:52 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote: > > I also fixed a number of other bugs, e.g., properties other than > > rdf:first/rdf:rest are being lost for list nodes in the currently > > specified algorithm. It also converts lists identified by a IRI > > and thus looses the IRI. > > This seems wrong to me. The RDF Collection syntactic sugar in all other > serializations requires that the list be well-formed, and have all > BNode subjects. If a list is not well-formed, has anything other than a > BNode subject, or contains properties other than rdf:first and rdf:rest > (and possibly rdf:type of rdf:List), it should not use the list syntax, > but should revert back to basic object representation, IMO. Exactly. Perhaps my email was not clear. The algorithm defined in the current spec has those bugs. My implementation fixes them. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 1 May 2013 20:09:51 UTC