Re: JSON-LD - RDF alignment editorial issues from David Booth on 2013-07-09 (public-linked-json@w3.org from July 2013)

From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 16:30:27 -0400
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
CC: 'Linked JSON' <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-ID: <51DC72E3.8010506@dbooth.org>

On 07/09/2013 02:56 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 8:28 PM, David Booth wrote:
>> s/JSON-LD to RDF converters/JSON-LD processors/
>
> This is problematic because it would combine two separate product classes
> into one. What about changing it to "JSON-LD as RDF interpreters"?

Sure, that's fine, but probably best to hyphenate: "JSON-LD-as-RDF 
interpreters".  Or maybe "RDF interpretation of JSON-LD" would be clearer.

David

Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2013 20:30:54 UTC