W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > February 2013

Re: rdfa11.jsonld (was Re: Open Annotation / Default Context Location?)

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:55:50 +0100
Message-Id: <BE6C33BD-A750-445D-8C97-9A04ACB4D7BE@w3.org>
Cc: "<public-linked-json@w3.org>" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Ok!

Ivan

----
Ivan Herman
+31 641044153

(Written on my mobile. Excuses for brevity and frequent misspellings...)



On 28 Feb 2013, at 14:34, "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote:

> Awesome! Thanks Ivan
> 
> 
>> I was wondering whether we should not have a
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2013/json-ld-context/rdfa11.json
>> 
>> as well, used if, through conneg, somebody asks for application/json.
> 
> Since this is so specific to JSON-LD I don't think that's required. Let's
> not support bad practices (at least not until someone asks for it and
> provides good arguments for doing so).
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Markus
> 
> 
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
> 
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2013 13:56:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:39 GMT