W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > February 2013

JSON-LD 1.0 Ready for Last Call

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:14:30 -0500
Message-ID: <512A90C6.2090807@digitalbazaar.com>
To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
CC: JSON-LD CG <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Hi all,

The JSON-LD CG approved[1] the JSON-LD 1.0 publication as a 2nd Final
Community Group Specification last week. The document can be found here:

http://json-ld.org/spec/FCGS/json-ld-syntax/20130222/

The editors feel that the document is ready to go into Last Call with
the following caveats:

1. It needs to be reviewed by the RDF WG so that we can be sure that it
   is in line with the expectations of the group.
2. The sub-optimal solution to the blank node identifiers for graph
   names issue needs to be reviewed by the RDF WG.
3. The property generator feature should be marked as an at-risk
   feature requiring feedback during LC review.
4. We may want to put in an issue marker noting that we may introduce
   @base functionality if Jeremy Carroll's use case is compelling. Or
   we may want to put the feature in there and mark it as at-risk.

David, Guus, could you please make sure to spend a bit of time on the
next call asking for a couple of reviews from RDF WG members before we
go into LC?

-- manu

PS: This does not include the JSON-LD 1.0 Algorithms and API document,
we're still working on getting the last of the CG comments addressed in
that spec.

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals
http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/
Received on Sunday, 24 February 2013 22:15:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:39 GMT