W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > November 2012

Fwd: Intent to close issues 125 and 192

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 02:04:13 -0500
To: "public-linked-json@w3.org JSON" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5F20BAB6-3138-4592-887C-21EA242035C6@greggkellogg.net>
Begin forwarded message:

> From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
> Subject: Re: Intent to close issues 125 and 192
> Date: November 9, 2012 5:23:49 PM PST
> To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
> Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
> 
> I also addressed Issue 193 [5] in some of these commits. I'll close that one too, unless you think it needs more work.
> 
> Gregg Kellogg
> gregg@greggkellogg.net
> 
> On Nov 9, 2012, at 4:16 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
> 
>> Changes that were requested to deal with RDF conversion terminology have been commited, and I will close the issues in 24 hours unless I hear objections.
>> 
>> The affected issues are issue 125 Define from/to RDF algorithms in terms of standard RDF [1] and issue 192 What's a "string representation in fromRDF [2].
>> 
>> Issue 125 is addressed in [3] using the suggested terminology.
>> 
>> Issue 192 is addressed in [3] by using either "canonical lexcial form" or "expanded form". I also added the term "expanded IRI form", which can actually represent either an absolute IRI or a blank node. 
>> 
>> Gregg Kellogg
>> gregg@greggkellogg.net
>> 
>> [1] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/125
>> [2] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/192
>> [3] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/commit/846616d3f8fc6bffa4af31bbdd952c3bc893e56f
>> [4] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/commit/168ba91fde86eb68d58de0f911aa6873d1200865
> 
> 
Received on Saturday, 10 November 2012 07:04:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:38 GMT