Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 6th 2012

On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>wrote:
[...]

> Agenda
>
> 1. Brief review of RDF WG Face-to-Face
>    *
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-10-30#JSON__2d_LD_Syntax_document
> 2. Strategy for addressing pre-LC RDF WG issues
>    * Async proposals/straw-polls via issue tracker
> 3. Review of new issues
>    * Clarify sets and lists
>      https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/170
>    * JSON-LD data model clarifications
>      https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/174
>    * Rephrase "adding meaning" in Syntax specification
>      https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/177
>    * Make link to RDF more apparent in the specification
>      https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/180
>    * Consider renaming JSON-LD API to JSON-LD Core Processing
>      https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/178
>    * Consider moving WebIDL to Appendix or Note
>      https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/179
> 4. ISSUE-159: Add specifying @language to expanded form
>    * https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/159


I just posted proposed updates to the JSON-LD Syntax document grammar:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-linked-json/2012Nov/0001.html

That's all under ISSUE-166: Add a Conformance section although that goes a
bit further than that.
 https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/166

Time permitting, can this be added to the agenda?

Thanks,
Francois.