- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 21:43:22 -0400
- To: RDF Comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
- CC: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On 05/22/2012 06:17 PM, David Wood wrote: >>> A couple of questions: * Is JSON-LD an RDF serialization? >> >> I think the best way of saying it is: it can be used as an RDF >> serialization, although applications may use it directly, too, >> without referring to RDF. > > It seems to me that any such format (e.g. Turtle) could be used as > "just a format" I disagree. JSON (and thus JSON-LD) can be parsed into native data structures in a variety of languages. Many languages have built-in JSON processors. There is no such standard API or data structure for any RDF serialization that I know of (and no, triples don't count). :) > but we know that the RDF serializations represent data in accordance > with the RDF data model. Yes, but JSON-LD can support things that are not supported by the RDF data model - like predicates that are string values, or 2-tuples, for instance (things that you can do in JSON, but not RDF). Sure, you can model this stuff in RDF... but you have to do strange things like assign a key-value pair a bnode subject... or generate an IRI from the string value to ensure that the predicate-expressed-as-a-string "fits" into the RDF model. > I would therefore prefer to see JSON-LD described as an RDF > serialization. It's the other way around. RDF is a subset of JSON-LD. > Is there any reason not to do so? All of the reasons above. :) -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: PaySwarm Website for Developers Launched http://digitalbazaar.com/2012/02/22/new-payswarm-alpha/
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2012 01:44:13 UTC