W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > July 2012

Re: an idea: @context in coercion rules ?

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:09:50 +0200
Cc: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0C8FE7A7-634E-4846-99B0-E33F2269E446@w3.org>
To: "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>

On Jul 31, 2012, at 12:53 , Markus Lanthaler wrote:

>> I am worried about this. Of course, there may be situation where this
>> might be handy. But... I am, in general, afraid of building an RDF/XML
>> in JSON. What I mean is that having too much choices to express the
>> same things may lead to user confusion and, ultimately, rejection.
> 
> I couldn't agree more and raised the same concern in last week's telecon.
> This specific issue was
> 
> RESOLVED: Do not support embedding @contexts within a @context to re-define
> the IRI that a term maps to. [1]
> 
> 
>> My personal feeling is that we should have a feature freeze in JSON-LD
>> and, rather, look at every feature and variations with eagle eyes to
>> see if they are needed and, in case of doubt, remove them.
> 
> I mostly agree with this as well. The only thing I think we should really
> consider is to make @container more powerful, see [2] and [3] for details
> but even there I'm not sure whether this really needs to go into JSON-LD
> 1.0.
> 
> 

Well...

I think one of the criteria we will have to use is that if I look at an example and it is not immediately clear what a feature really does, then this is a candidate for removal. I guess criteria, mainly in view of the audience of JSON-LD, is valid, though, I admit, fuzzy. 

Well, I looked at both [2] and [3] and none of these passed this test:-( Plus I do not see the real necessity to add features to generate those particular output. Ie, at this moment, I would not be in favour of adding any of those two things into JSON-LD. Feature freeze...:-)

Ivan

> [1] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/144#issuecomment-7209951
> [2] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/133
> [3] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/134
> 
> 
> 
> P.S.: Sorry for my last fat-fingered mail.
> 
> 
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2012 11:10:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:37 GMT