W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > January 2012

RE: Multiple graphs syntax (ISSUE-68)

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 02:08:06 +0800
To: "'Ivan Herman'" <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: "'Linked JSON'" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-ID: <015e01cce043$4b2c3200$e1849600$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
> I am sorry, but I do not think that is really good. My use case is the
> serialization of an RDFa content; that content very often contains
> several graphs (e.g., there might be statements on some content the
> author defines, and then some other statements on the enclosing HTML
> file). The context for all these graphs are identical or, to be more
> exact, an RDFa processor has no way to find out (or it is very
> complicated) which context should be used for which graph. As a result,
> possibly complex contexts (with all the namespace definitions from the
> RDFa source) will be repeated. I think that is ugly.

What is the intended end use of this RDFa to JSON-LD conversion? You could,
e.g., directly create an expanded document without any contexts in it.



--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler




Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2012 18:08:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:36 GMT