W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > January 2012

RE: Is this valid JSON-LD?

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:21:55 +0800
To: "'Ivan Herman'" <ivan@w3.org>, "'Linked JSON'" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00a801ccd05b$9eb2c8a0$dc1859e0$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
Ivan, this is ISSUE-43 which is currently being discussed. See:
https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/43


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 8:07 PM
> To: Linked JSON
> Subject: Is this valid JSON-LD?
> 
> Something that I have not seen anywhere in the document:
> 
> {
>   "@context" : {
>      "http://www.example.org/pred" : { "@type" : "@id" }
>    },
>    ...
>    "http://www.example.org/pred" : "http://ivan-herman.net"
>    ...
> }
> 
> yielding
> 
> [ <http://www.example.org/pred> <http://ivan-herman.net> ]
> 
> I would expect the answer to be yes, but there is nowhere a more formal
> definition of @context that would give me straight answer.
> 
> This (and my question yesterday on the "@id" : [...] idiom) reinforces
> my feeling that a somewhat more formal definition of the various json-
> ld structures would be welcome in my view.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Ivan
> 
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> 
> 
> 
> 


Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 12:29:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:36 GMT