W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > August 2012

RE: an idea: @context in coercion rules ?

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 12:01:24 +0200
To: "'Ivan Herman'" <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: "'Gregg Kellogg'" <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00dd01cd6fcc$9cd48f80$d67dae80$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
> Backward compatibility requirement: yes, I agree.
> 
> I am less confident about the second. Publishing a rec but having a
> next version already as an official draft does not seem to be the right
> message to be sent out. Personally, I would prefer to wait for more
> extensive usage and implementation experiences to be gathered with a
> stable spec.

Well, the signal I want to send out is that there is a *small* set of
features that should be available *soon* in contrast to what usually
happens: at *some point in the future* there might be a *big* change (even
if it is backwards compatible).


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2012 10:01:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:37 GMT