- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 19:54:13 +0200
- To: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
- Cc: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On 1 Sep 2011, at 17:44, Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com> wrote: > Hi Markus, > >> 1. JSON-LD (the language) >> 2. JSON-LD Processing (APIs, algorithms, etc.) > I think this makes a lot of sense! > >> Please note that I'm strictly against about having a basic and an advanced >> spec. Think of it more as "separation of concerns". > I am also against those basic/advanced constructs. Give the > implementer what she needs, give the publisher/developer what she > needs. > There is still the conformance question. Is a conformant JSON-LD implementation required to implement framing? It strikes me as superfluous in some cases... Ivan >> If there is enough interest, I will create a draft of the specs as a base >> for further discussion. > I would be very grateful if you did. Thanks for the effort! Let's see > what the others say... > > Best, > Tom > > -- > Thomas Steiner, Research Scientist, Google Inc. > http://blog.tomayac.com, http://twitter.com/tomayac >
Received on Thursday, 1 September 2011 17:54:48 UTC