W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Prefix or term definition?

From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@sidewinderlabs.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 21:23:39 +0100
Message-ID: <CANTqjM=gKpfeKFZfrZgYqHay5YMsvcfsiKqs8UdLrs4pc7EoHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
CURIEs *are* just string concatenations. :)

On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> That would be my understanding, too. Afaik, the prefix and the term are the same thing in json ld (and we do not even have to talk about curies, simply string concatenations)
>
> I.
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman
> Tel:+31 641044153
> http://www.ivan-herman.net
>
>
>
> On 5 Oct 2011, at 18:18, "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure if this is an issue, but currently there's no way to specify if
>> a mapping in the context is for a prefix or a term. So, what would be the
>> result of this (admittedly silly) example.
>>
>>
>> {
>>  "@context": { "payment": "http://example.com/payment/" },
>>  "payment:payment": "done",
>>  "payment:amount": 20.4
>> }
>>
>>
>> Assuming that I interpret the spec correctly I would expect the following:
>>
>> <> http://example.com/payment/http://example.com/payment/ "done"
>> <> http://example.com/payment/amount "20.4"^^xsd:double
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Markus Lanthaler
>> @markuslanthaler
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2011 20:24:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:35 GMT