W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > October 2011

RE: ISSUE-30 - JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2011-10-04

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 18:47:00 +0200
To: "'Gregg Kellogg'" <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
Cc: "'Linked JSON'" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-ID: <045401cc837e$6880c810$39825830$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
> > PROPOSAL:
> > Do not differentiate between JSON-LD Context documents and JSON-LD
> instance documents. If @context is specified in a JSON-LD document and
> a remote document is listed, the remote document's @context element is
> merged into the current active context. If there is no @context element
> in the remote document, the active context remains unchanged.
> 
> +1, but we'll need to be more explicit in the processing steps. We also
> need to introduce the array notation to specify multiple contexts for a
> single key.

Yes, of course. The sake of this email was to explain what we talked about
yesterday as a first step towards consensus. I didn't want to create more
confusion by conflate this issue with the one of having multiple contexts.


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2011 16:47:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:35 GMT