W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Stream-based processing!?

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:54:54 +0200
Cc: "'Olivier Grisel'" <olivier.grisel@ensta.org>, "'Gregg Kellogg'" <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>, <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-Id: <D3D23C11-7EE3-4101-86AC-A0E7AB7F3C5E@w3.org>
To: "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>

On Oct 4, 2011, at 16:08 , Markus Lanthaler wrote:

>> The question is really of practice, and we may have to look around
>> for feedback. Ie: how easy is it, for different JSON libraries out
>> there, to ensure order in parsing and, more importantly, for the
>> production of JSON? Or do we require JSON-LD programmers, data
>> producers, etc, to use non-standard tools? In other words, does the
>> JSON community ignore the RFC spec and, in effect, uses ordering?
> 
> I don't really like the idea of enforcing ordering since then it isn't 100% JSON anymore. A SHOULD in the spec and describing the advantage of allowing one-pass processing should do it IMHO. The use case isn't important enough to break "compliance" with standard JSON and I doubt that a lot of people will use JSON-LD in a streaming-mode.
> 

Works for me. But I am not streaming:-)

Ivan

> 
> 
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
> 
> 
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2011 14:53:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:35 GMT