- From: Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:59:18 -0500
- To: Josh Mandel <Joshua.Mandel@childrens.harvard.edu>
- CC: public-linked-json@w3.org
On 11/22/2011 07:55 PM, Josh Mandel wrote: > Hi Dave, > > That's exactly what I'm looking for. (For what it's worth, if I > change "false" to "true" in your example, the playground appears to > crash.) I'll have to look into that. Thanks for the heads up. :) > Thanks! > > -Josh > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Dave Longley > <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: >> Josh, >> >> Is this what you're looking for? >> >> http://tinyurl.com/jsonld-framing-a2 >> >> -Dave >> >> >> On 11/22/2011 06:48 PM, Josh Mandel wrote: >>> I've asked something like this before on IRC, but I'm having trouble >>> designing a frame to do what I want. Here's an example where I have >>> defined a four objects of type LeftNode and RightNode. Each node >>> "canSee" two other nodes. I'd like my framed output to represent each >>> Node as its own object (in an array), and to represent its links to >>> other nodes as a list of IRIs under the "canSee" predicate. But all I >>> can accomplish is either: >>> >>> * nested outputs (Nodes nested under Nodes) >>> * canSee lists that are sometimes lists, but sometimes now (as in the >>> link below) >>> >>> Am I trying to do something outside the capabilities of the current >>> Framing API? It's hard for me to rigorously evaluate exactly what's >>> possible and what isn't, without just mucking around. >>> >>> Example at: http://tinyurl.com/jsonld-framing-q1 >>> >>> Thanks for your help! >>> >>> -Josh >>> >> >> -- >> Dave Longley >> CTO >> Digital Bazaar, Inc. >> >> -- Dave Longley CTO Digital Bazaar, Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 04:59:56 UTC