W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Framing Question (by example)

From: Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:59:18 -0500
Message-ID: <4ECC7DA6.5020209@digitalbazaar.com>
To: Josh Mandel <Joshua.Mandel@childrens.harvard.edu>
CC: public-linked-json@w3.org
On 11/22/2011 07:55 PM, Josh Mandel wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> That's exactly what I'm looking for.  (For what it's worth, if I
> change "false" to "true" in your example, the playground appears to
> crash.)

I'll have to look into that. Thanks for the heads up. :)

> Thanks!
>
>    -Josh
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Dave Longley
> <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>  wrote:
>> Josh,
>>
>> Is this what you're looking for?
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/jsonld-framing-a2
>>
>> -Dave
>>
>>
>> On 11/22/2011 06:48 PM, Josh Mandel wrote:
>>> I've asked something like this before on IRC, but I'm having trouble
>>> designing a frame to do what I want.  Here's an example where I have
>>> defined a four  objects of type LeftNode and RightNode.  Each node
>>> "canSee" two other nodes.  I'd like my framed output to represent each
>>> Node as its own object (in an array), and to represent its links to
>>> other nodes as a list of IRIs under the "canSee" predicate.  But all I
>>> can accomplish is either:
>>>
>>>    * nested outputs (Nodes nested under Nodes)
>>>    * canSee lists that are sometimes lists, but sometimes now (as in the
>>> link below)
>>>
>>> Am I trying to do something outside the capabilities of the current
>>> Framing API? It's hard for me to rigorously evaluate exactly what's
>>> possible and what isn't, without just mucking around.
>>>
>>> Example at:  http://tinyurl.com/jsonld-framing-q1
>>>
>>> Thanks for your help!
>>>
>>>    -Josh
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Longley
>> CTO
>> Digital Bazaar, Inc.
>>
>>


-- 
Dave Longley
CTO
Digital Bazaar, Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 04:59:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:35 GMT