W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > May 2011

Re: LinkedData != RDF ?

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 06:57:27 -0400
Message-ID: <4DDA3D97.9080605@openlinksw.com>
To: public-linked-json@w3.org
On 5/20/11 1:58 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> I think that would be a short term gain (people using something labeled
> "linked data" and people using URIs to identify things), but a long term
> loss, because (by having different formats for data), still no
> interoperability.
> I wouldn't be terribly opposed to reversing starts 4 and 5, so you do
> triples-with-shared-URIs first, then RDF second, ..

Is there an agreement re. going back to the original TimBL meme re. 
Linked Data i.e, one that replaces:
"When someone looks up a URI, provide useful information, using the 
standards (RDF*, SPARQL)"

with the original that read:
When someone looks up a URI, provide useful information.

Either way, let's close this critical matter :)



Kingsley Idehen	
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Monday, 23 May 2011 10:57:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:53:17 UTC