W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > May 2011

Re: LinkedData != RDF ?

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 14:33:04 -0400
Message-ID: <4DD6B3E0.30701@openlinksw.com>
To: public-linked-json@w3.org
On 5/20/11 1:40 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
> Well, my goal was to spark some discussion on what I see as the barriers to adoption of RDF, and at least I think I've accomplished that.

Yes.

Linked Data should never have been inextricably bound (overtly or 
covertly). Let's fix this anomaly ASAP by getting behind a JSON syntax 
for Linked Data representation. The Semantic Fidelity of JSON based 
Linked Data graphs is a secondary matter to be addressed once there's a 
generally accepted syntax for Linked Data graphs.

Basically, JSON variant of N-Triples. Let's not burn time on Prefixes etc..

N-Triples and CSV go hand in hand. A JSON syntax should deliver 
something similar. Simple but powerful!

Links

1. http://visitmix.com/writings/the-rise-of-json --- self explanatory

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Friday, 20 May 2011 18:33:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:34 GMT