W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > May 2011

Re: Updated JSON-LD draft - no more microsyntaxes

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 14:33:19 -0400
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
CC: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-ID: <FE5EF72F-72EB-421E-B905-FE683D734F39@kellogg-assoc.com>
On May 18, 2011, at 9:08 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:

> ...
> A few of us are currently thinking about a test suite - we may setup the
> test suite like we did the RDFa test suite - which would allow you to
> plug in different processors. The validation aspect could be done in
> SPARQL. However, that's just a first cut at an idea for a test suite -
> there may be a better way to do this. So, help with figuring out how we
> could do a test suite would be great.

I'd be happy to help on this too, and was thinking about doing something on this myself. However, this could be an issue if the syntax is in any flux.

As RDFa shows, SPARQL is effective, but unless you have a local SPARQL processor available, it can make the development cycle difficult (i.e., publish to distiller and run test suite). Other RDF languages do this through graph equivalence with an N-Triples representation, which is can also be challenging, but is fairly common for other test suites (RDF/XML, Turtle, N3). It's certainly useful to be able to integrate testing in my local development environment that can be run off line.

However, leveraging the RDFa test suite infrastructure could allow us to be up and running fairly soon, given someone willing to host the suite.

> ...
> -- manu
> -- 
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: PaySwarm Developer Tools and Demo Released
> http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/05/05/payswarm-sandbox/

Received on Thursday, 19 May 2011 18:34:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:53:17 UTC