- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:27:13 +0100
- To: public-linked-json@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2011 08:27:36 UTC
On 6/28/11 2:16 AM, Gregg Kellogg wrote: > It is designed to be able to express key-value pairs, RDF data, > Microformats data, and Microdata. The above could read: it is designed to enable creation of Linked Data via EAV/SPO based graphs. Why does it need "RDF" in there? Ditto "Microformats" and "Microdata" ? Those are all about alternative syntaxes that can be used to achieve the same goal. Is JSON-LD about syntax to syntax mapping or syntax applied to a concept of Linked Data. That's the problem. I continue to struggle with the fear of RDF underemphasis. How can something so powerful be so insecure? Is the WWW about syntax or the power of Architecture of the World Wide Web (AWWW)? -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2011 08:27:36 UTC