W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > June 2011

Re: Yet another serialization format?

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:00:09 -0400
Message-ID: <4E0951C9.3000508@digitalbazaar.com>
To: public-linked-json@w3.org
On 06/27/2011 01:00 PM, William Waites wrote:
> * [2011-06-27 22:28:46 +0800] Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> écrit:
> 
> ] The only use case I've heard here is, as far as I remember, PaySwarm - which
> ] I admittedly didn't have a close look at. I think a linked data approach
> ] based on JSON should be based on the applications where JSON is currently
> ] used, i.e., Web APIs. One of the things the clearly differentiates Web APIs
> ] from the "document-based Web" is that the representations usually follow a
> ] quite strict schema and all look the same.
> 
> One thing that some people want to be able to do is take LD and put it
> into one of the mongo/couch/riak type databases - I'm not sure it has
> been mentioned here but it is definitely something that comes up
> relatively often in my conversations with people. If we get the spec
> right, it will be possible to do this and at the same time have
> an easy compatibility with RDF for interchanging data amongst these
> databases.

William,

What do you think the JSON-LD spec does right now that doesn't allow
this to happen in mongo/couch/riak?

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: PaySwarm Developer Tools and Demo Released
http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/05/05/payswarm-sandbox/
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2011 04:00:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:34 GMT