- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 23:01:12 +0100
- To: public-linked-json@w3.org
On 6/27/11 10:50 PM, Patrick Logan wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:29 PM, glenn mcdonald<glenn@furia.com> wrote: >> You're kind of rephrasing the question: what are the goals here? Is JSON-LD >> a RDF serialization, or a convention for representing graphs in JSON, or >> something else? If it's strictly an RDF serialization, then I probably don't >> care about it, but I thought the whole point of "JSON-LD" as a new effort >> distinct from the RDF/JSON working group was to reopen precisely this >> question, so that it might be answered in a way that would lead to >> significantly simpler and more accessible spec... > OK - now I think you are on to something. The goals of a spec should > be clear before the spec work begins. > > -Patrick > > Amen! Yes, to both of you! -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Monday, 27 June 2011 22:01:36 UTC