W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > June 2011

Re: JSON-LD bnode canonical naming algorithm

From: glenn mcdonald <glenn@furia.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 01:52:10 +0000
Message-ID: <BANLkTimoC-du1Ssaf_zgbsDzU2xgFD8-yQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: "public-linked-json@w3.org" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
> 1. How can you represent RDFa data using JSON-LD?
> I'm not convinced this should be a requirement.
> 3. How do you represent relationships between semantic objects like
>   Microformats, which do not typically have URLs or any other types of
>>   identifiers for things.
> I'm not convinced this should be a requirement.

Just to be a little more precise about these two: I don't believe that
direct and completely reversible transcriptions of RDFa or Microformat data
with exact semantic correspondence should necessarily be a core requirement
of JSON-LD. I agree that directed, labeled graphs represented in RDFa or
Microformats (or RDF or Topic Maps or whatever else) should be
straightforwardly translatable to JSON-LD, but to me this is exactly the
same as saying that JSON-LD exists to represent directed, labeled graphs in
JSON in the first place...
Received on Sunday, 19 June 2011 01:53:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:53:17 UTC