W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > June 2011

Re: Comments on the complexity of the JSON-LD spec

From: Thomas Steiner <tsteiner@google.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 08:51:42 +0200
Message-ID: <-3417452513060779148@unknownmsgid>
To: "nathan@webr3.org" <nathan@webr3.org>
Cc: Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>, "public-linked-json@w3.org" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Thank God not sent from a BlackBerry, but from my iPhone

On 17.06.2011, at 23:39, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:

> Dave Longley wrote:
>> On 06/03/2011 02:24 PM, Brian Peterson wrote:
>>>
>>> I believe that the popularity of JSON is based primarily on its simplicity. IMHO, JS developers and other consumers of JSON are going to expect simplicity. A JSON-LD specification that is 10x longer than the original JSON specification is going to be a non-starter for the majority of JSON developers -- a big majority. Honestly, I think the first JSON-LD spec should fit in an email (a short email, unlike the ones I tend to write).
>>>
>> I definitely agree that much of JSON's popularity is due to its simplicity. However, my opinion is that most JS/JSON developers probably haven't looked at the JSON spec. Most JS developers certainly haven't looked at the ECMAScript spec.
>> If a developer does have a question, then I'd expect them to be much more likely to look at examples on the web or a "howto" page than the spec.
>
> Exactly people just google "MDC methodName()"!, the spec just has to be technically sound and easily understandable for *implementers* to read (whilst implementing), the rest will follow from that.
Full +1 on that. MDC stands for Mozilla Developer/-ment Center, as a
side remark for those whose 1st language isn't JavaScript.

Thanks,
Tom
>
Received on Saturday, 18 June 2011 06:52:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:34 GMT