- From: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:21:07 -0400
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Cc: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, "public-linked-json@w3.org" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On Jul 19, 2011, at 11:50 AM, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
> If the JSON-LD spec says "Items SHOULD be named with an IRI" this might imply that the processing steps do not need to consider the case when it's not, or that authors using unnamed items (or even items named with literals, for example) are somehow wrong. If an author conceivably COULD name all nodes with an IRI that means that they MUST.
Please see --
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119
SHOULD has an explicit semantic meaning.
Be seeing you,
Ted
--
A: Yes. http://www.guckes.net/faq/attribution.html
| Q: Are you sure?
| | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
| | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Ted Thibodeau, Jr. // voice +1-781-273-0900 x32
Evangelism & Support // mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com
// http://twitter.com/TallTed
OpenLink Software, Inc. // http://www.openlinksw.com/
10 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 265, Burlington MA 01803
http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/uda/
OpenLink Blogs http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/virtuoso/
http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
Universal Data Access and Virtual Database Technology Providers
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 17:21:51 UTC