W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > July 2011

Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2011-07-04

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:50:38 +0100
Message-ID: <4E1E2F4E.1000506@openlinksw.com>
To: public-linked-json@w3.org
On 7/14/11 12:31 AM, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
> I updated the requirements document as discussed [1]. As the question of @subject having an IRI label being MAY or SHOULD, I left it as MAY for the time being, with an issue noting some reasons why it is still MAY. We can always re-address this in the future.
>
> I made some editorial changes to section 3.2 (JSON-LD), but this hasn't received any significant discussion. If we can move on from 3.1 for the time being, let's see which of these we can form consensus over, which remain contentious (perhaps annotating the issue) and requirements that might be missing.
>
> Thanks for everyone's participation in trying to bring some closure to the requirements, and especially to Brad's word-smithing.
>
> Gregg
>
> [1] http://json-ld.org/requirements/latest/
>
>
>
Gregg,

Note:
3.2 JSON-LD

The following are taken to be requirements for expressing JSON as Linked 
Data.

It should read:
The following are taken to be requirements for creating Linked Data 
using JSON.

or

The following are taken to be requirements for JSON based Linked Data.


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Wednesday, 13 July 2011 23:51:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:53:17 UTC