Re: Allow HTTP Link header as _alternative_ @context provision method

On 8/29/11 10:09 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
>> We've discussed both Link and Accept/Content HTTP
>> headers as impacting a JSON-LD processor. I think
>> using Link makes sense.
> Is there any problem with specifying both?
>
>
>> I'd however favor describedby instead of "context"
>> in the header [2]
> +1

+1 for describedby .

Kingsley
>
> Please also note that an issue on GitHub has been created for that last
> week:
>
> https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/16
>
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>
>
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen