RE: Allow HTTP Link header as _alternative_ @context provision method from Markus Lanthaler on 2011-08-29 (public-linked-json@w3.org from August 2011)

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 19:09:40 +0200
To: <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-ID: <033701cc666e$7118d3f0$534a7bd0$@lanthaler@gmx.net>

> We've discussed both Link and Accept/Content HTTP
> headers as impacting a JSON-LD processor. I think
> using Link makes sense.

Is there any problem with specifying both?


> I'd however favor describedby instead of "context"
> in the header [2]

+1


Please also note that an issue on GitHub has been created for that last
week:

https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/16



--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Monday, 29 August 2011 17:10:08 UTC